Community | Join | Dating | Discussions | Moderators | FAQ

Take a Survey
Sign Guestbook
Join Club for Free!


Edit your profile   Registration is free!   Frequently Asked Questions   Search   Home

Email This Page to Someone!
Show a Printable Version
afanti-tour.com Discussion Forum > South African Politics
Can The People Really Be Free If They Do Not Own The Land Beneath Their Feet?
< Last Thread     Next Thread >
Author
Thread    This thread is 4 pages long:    1   2   3   4   Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Tiger32
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2001
Posts: 538

In the central highlands of southern Africa are numerous, scattered remnants of gigantic fortresses and massive stone walls stretching over thousands of acres. These are the ruins of the majestic cities of Great Zimbabwe (1200 - 1450). This ancient African kingdom organized and controlled the gold and ivory caravans that proceeded from the interior to the southeast coast of Africa where trade was conducted with Arabia and India for textiles, utensils, glassware and weaponry. Great Zimbabwe was eventually replaced by the Mutapa Empire (1450 - 1630) which, in its turn, was succeeded by the kingdom of Changamire.

The Mutapa king had ultimate religious authority over the Shona people. His power was symbolized by the Divine Flame that burned continuously in his court. His subordinate rulers in the countryside had their own individual flames lit from his central Royal Fire. By 1630, the Portuguese, who had been exploring the coasts of Africa for more than a century, conquered the Mutapa Empire. In 1685, though, a local ruler, Changamire, defeated, and drove out, the Portuguese and established a kingdom, named after himself, Changamire, that lasted well into the 19th century.

By the 1880s, however, the nations of Western Europe, having been vastly enriched by centuries of free African labor, were moving determinedly from their largely coastal encampments to carve the continent up into a patchwork of colonies. (The Berlin Conference of 1884 formalized the process.) Britain, of course, was a key player in all of this. Its African gold and diamond mines were essential to the development and maintenance of its globe-spanning empire.

The individual who personified British power and influence in Africa was Cecil Rhodes. In fact, the south central highland region we are referring to, which is today the nation of Zimbabwe, was for a time a British colony called Southern Rhodesia in honor of Cecil Rhodes. Rhodes consolidated the thousands of individual gold and diamond claims by white miners in South Africa, and formed the fabled DeBeers Gold and Diamond mining company which today controls the price of gold and gems worldwide. He worked mightily to create and maintain the adjacent British colonies of South Africa, Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) and Northern Rhodesia (Zambia) and other British holdings.

Rhodes and his followers waged a series of bitter military campaigns, supported by the British army, against the Shona, Ndebele and other African peoples. By 1895, in Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), for example, the Africans were forced off all the good farmland, their movements restricted, and ultimately left no recourse but to work as laborers on "white owned" land. The white population of Southern Rhodesia, never more than 4%, completely controlled the land, the resources, the economy and the government.

During the 1950s and 60s, while most of the European colonies in Africa were gaining their independence, the southern tier of the continent remained firmly under white control. The region was fully occupied by 7 different British and Portuguese colonies. In 1965, when it appeared that Britain intended to grant independence to Southern Rhodesia, with equivalent rights for Blacks and whites, the white settler government seceded from the Empire and declared themselves the independent white-ruled country of "Rhodesia."

The UN instituted some ineffectual sanctions, and Britain looked the other way, refusing to use force to bring its former colony into line. A small, but persistent, guerilla movement soon developed. The well-equipped white Rhodesian army held its own for awhile. However, in 1975, when the adjacent Portuguese colonies of Mozambique and Angola, won their independence with military aid from Cuba, things began to change. Robert Mugabe and other guerilla leaders were soon mounting devastating military attacks in Rhodesia. By 1980, the white Rhodesians surrendered power to the black majority led by Mugabe. They promptly renamed the country Zimbabwe.

For more than 20 years afterwards, Robert Mugabe and the government of Zimbabwe peacefully negotiated with Britain, the white settlers and other interested parties to regain at least some of the land of the Africans. But all to no avail. Finally, now, 22 years after coming to power, they are taking forceful steps to regain their land. These actions have been greeted with hostility by the white farmers, Britain and America. Despite the fact that Rhodesia is a fully sovereign nation, the US is openly threatening to topple the Mugabe government.

The land question is the ultimate question, not only in Zimbabwe but throughout Africa and around the world. Can any country anywhere really be free if its people do not own the very land beneath their feet? No one is watching events in Zimbabwe with more concern than the white minority in South Africa which, though no longer in power, still controls the land, the precious, invaluable land of the richest nation in the Motherland...

18th September 2002 06:23
Click Here to See the Profile for Tiger32    Find more posts by Tiger32        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Jaybang
Senior Member

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 586
Tiger -- please explain a bit more..

As far as returning the land to Africans, can we just get specific here....

Lets take for example, my family's house in Durban.

Id like to understand exactly how you think this land redistribution scheme of your is supposed to work, and how your idea is supposed to affect me.

1 ) Are you saying that, my family, should hand over the keys to the house, to say.. the African man they employee who comes around once a week to do the garden?

2) What about Indians, and other ethnic people of South Africa, who are not white, but not African... under your land redistribution scheme, do they have to pack up and go back to India or where ever there ethnicity is traced?

3 ) What about mixed race people, or families that are intermarried, black/ white? What about there kids who are mixed race?

4 ) Are you looking for only pure bred Africans, or do you have a set of rules as to who gets to stay and who gets to go?

5 ) What happens if your African, but your parents are American by birth, and you are born and grown up in the states? Does that give you more right to live in South Africa, then mixed race people born in South Africa? Does that give you more right to live in South Africa, then an Indian person who was born and raised there?

19th September 2002 06:33
Click Here to See the Profile for Jaybang    Find more posts by Jaybang        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Nubianman
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 213

Tiger32,
Long time! I can see you are still keeping up the good work and answering the racists in clear and concise language. Unfortunately I have been too bogged down with work and have therefore been unable to contribute to the debates as much as perhaps I might have enjoyed.

On mugabe does anyone know that when Tony Blair became the prime minister his secretary of state for international development, Clair Short who is supposedly a left winger wrote a letter to the Zimbabwean government which contained words to the effect that “we do not accept that Britain has a special responsibility to meet the costs of land purchase in Zimbabwe. She further wrote “we are a new government from diverse backgrounds without links to former colonial interests. My own origins are Irish and as you know we were colonised and colonisers”. Obviously to any fair-minded person this caused the expected huge outrage within the Zimbabwean government especially given the fact that there was already an agreement under which Britain would pay for the land purchase as agreed with the Mugabe government after the defeat of the racist Rhodesian government.

Indeed land, history and Zimbabwe are inextricably linked and have been since the first whites led by a British Business man Cecil Rhodes, invaded Mashonaland in 1890 in search of guess what – I am sure you have – gold and diamonds. This has always been the bane of the white man GREED. MONEY MONEY MONEY and no respect for the rights of other people. It is also unbelievable that a government could come in and claim that history had no relevance to present day circumstances and this claim obviously infuriated a man who had kept his people at bay in their quest for what was rightfully theirs. Racists like Jaybang with their hatred of African progress continue to ignored valid historical facts in that the Shona had settled in the area for over a thousand years and had built an impressive culture as evidenced by the remains to date of the Great Zimbabwe, a city which dates back to the 12th century. The European historical revisionists even claim that the Queen of Sheeba whom they claim to have been white built this city. Hello??? They dismissed the Ndebeles as imbeciles who had then been driven up north by the Mfecanes following a war that took place about two millenniums ago. They exaggerated the power of their king and forced an agreement on him to grant them land against the indigenous Shona who were the original owners of the land.

Following this concession by the King of the Ndebeles the no of whites quickly rose and the British government supported this, as the original contingent of 196 whites became 5,000 by 1896 and 11,000 by 1901. With superior weapons as provided by gunpowder which was discovered by the Chinese, the whites were able to subdue the local people through countless massacres most of which was unrecorded but is today part of oral history handed down by traditionalists in Zimbabwe unto their children. Thousands of the local people were killed, raped and restricted to the least productive land in the so-called war of independence in 1897. This process was formally recognised in the 1914 when a Native Reserves Commission was set up. According to records recently made available, the Acting director of land settlement said “the area inhabited by the blacks practically a conglomeration of Kopje with very small cultivable valleys in between and is infested with baboons and is only traversable by pack animals, I see no objection in making this a native reserve. Between 1941 and 1951, the number of whites had doubled from 69,300 to 138,000 as many of them escaped the then rationed infested Britain in search of a better life following the events of the second world war.

It is also a well know fact that the so-called productive white farmers produce tobacco for export and this was evidenced from the fact that the exports of this product rose from £4m a year to £30m within ten years from the 1940’s to the 1950’s and then enforced cheap labour fuelled this growth to a large extent. This attracted more whites and in turn led to more Africans being forced to give up their land, though the burning of their homes and the raping of their women.

This obviously beggars the question as to what compensation these people want when death is what they deserve. The declaration of independence by Ian Smith caused even more war and over 30,000 Africans died due to the fallout of this war. According to an independent Commonwealth Observer report in 1980 white farmers enjoyed 79% of grade 1 and 2 land and blacks were on 75% of grade 3 and 4 land, which was deemed fit only for the grazing of cattle. How Britain which was the most tight fisted and the most guilty of all parties in providing funds for the purchase of land from the whites can turn around and say that they have a problem with the Mugabe giving land to his so-called cronies is simply beyond any human comprehension.

All I have done above is elucidate quite clear that Mugabe has the full support of Africans and also that the famine is a direct result of the drought the country is experiencing, for if we are to be honest the drought in other bordering African countries is just as bad if not worse, therefore I as the question – has there been any land distribution in worse hit Malawi, or even Zambia countries which are experiencing worse production of food. The facts are there for anyone who wants to do the work – 75% of Zimbabwe’s maize (it’s staple crop), is grown by the black farmers who earn a living from the marginal lands forced on them by their hateful oppressors.

Even though I have not been on this board for long it is clear to me that most of its registered members are whites who live at least for now in South Africa but to my black brothers, I say tarry not for in the end the truth will prevail and Zimbabwe is the beginning of us taking our land/pride back. It is better for a man to be dead than to live a life full of untruths and I am ready to pay whatever sacrifice is needed to see to this. Black people can no longer be fooled for a white man’s paradise is the black man’s hell. Believe me I know, I live with them everyday.

19th September 2002 21:21
Click Here to See the Profile for Nubianman    Find more posts by Nubianman        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Tiger32
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2001
Posts: 538

Good post Nubianman, I agree with you.

5th October 2002 02:17
Click Here to See the Profile for Tiger32    Find more posts by Tiger32        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Jaybang
Senior Member

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 586
Whats up Tiger..?

Tiger,

You never got around to answering my questions on land redistribution? Seeing as it one of your main concerns, why not answer my questions and get a bit more in depth on this topic.

Waiting....

Or are you just going to sit there and hide behind other peoples posts, while you fluff there tails?

22nd October 2002 08:58
Click Here to See the Profile for Jaybang    Find more posts by Jaybang        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
thiswoundedsoul
Senior Member

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 604

Tiger32 is one proud idiot.

4th November 2002 02:21
Click Here to See the Profile for thiswoundedsoul    Find more posts by thiswoundedsoul        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Tiger32
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2001
Posts: 538

quote:
Originally posted by thiswoundedsoul
Tiger32 is one proud idiot.

Woundedbrain, Let's just face it, a racist like yourself cannot handle the truth.

4th November 2002 19:09
Click Here to See the Profile for Tiger32    Find more posts by Tiger32        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
thiswoundedsoul
Senior Member

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 604

Where is your evidence?

5th November 2002 01:28
Click Here to See the Profile for thiswoundedsoul    Find more posts by thiswoundedsoul        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Tiger32
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2001
Posts: 538

quote:
Originally posted by thiswoundedsoul
Where is your evidence?

Perhaps you should try reading a history book, rather than the racist crap you are accustomed to, then you would not have to ask such silly questions.

5th November 2002 05:21
Click Here to See the Profile for Tiger32    Find more posts by Tiger32        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Jaybang
Senior Member

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 586

Hey seppo

How are you going? Whats going to be your racial, black power, backed by God comments today?


Just another black American with a chip on his shoulder.
So tell us... hows life in America? Let me guess... its very very different to Africa.... oh sorry you wouldnt quite know that, seeing that youve never been to Africa.

You know, i bet if you ever did get out to South Africa or any part of Africa,which as I, and every other person on this forum knows will never happen, you would probably moan and winge ..

You may have a black skin, but you aint no african. The sun would melt you in a second, you havnt even got an idea what its like to live in such a country...lol oh... and how do you plan to comunicate with other Africans... with sign language? You cant even speak and African Language..lol



5th November 2002 05:39
Click Here to See the Profile for Jaybang    Find more posts by Jaybang        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
thiswoundedsoul
Senior Member

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 604


I have stated before that my grandparents were friends and partners of Alan Paton, himself against racism. I have, all my life, been non-racist.

The history books, everywhere, plainly say that the 'settlers' of Suid Afrika were Dutch Calvinists, French Hugenots, and German Protestants. And then the British came. What is the common denominator here? Simply that the settlers were persecuted by Catholic nations. They came to Africa because they were homeless. Being, again, the minority, their impulse was to take control, which admittedly was bad. But, as a result of British colonialism, South Africa has some very fine universities and Victorian architexture. Yet, oddly, you want to keep all that, but you want the white man out...And neither do you ever mention the FACT the settlers WERE THEMSELVES VICTIMS OF PERSECUTION AND HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO RE-ESTABLISH THEIR CULTURE.

And so, in answer to your question, I have read history, hence the accuracy of my statements.

5th November 2002 05:50
Click Here to See the Profile for thiswoundedsoul    Find more posts by thiswoundedsoul        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Tiger32
Senior Member

Registered: Sep 2001
Posts: 538

quote:
Originally posted by thiswoundedsoul

I have stated before that my grandparents were friends and partners of Alan Paton, himself against racism. I have, all my life, been non-racist.




Just because your grandparents may or may not have been racist, does not mean that you aren't racist. I personally believe that you are a racist, maybe not to the degree of some in this forum, but I definitely consider you a racist.

8th November 2002 04:32
Click Here to See the Profile for Tiger32    Find more posts by Tiger32        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
thiswoundedsoul
Senior Member

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 604

lol

That's funny because none of my friends think I'm racist. None of my enemies think I'm racist. My family doesn't think I'm racist. My professors don't think I'm racist. My neighbors don't think I'm racist. My employer's don't think I'm racist. My acquaitences don't think I'm racist.

So, that leaves you. Tiger32 is the only person in the world who thinks I'm racist. Strangely enough, he has no evidence. I have as much evidence that Tiger32 is secretly plotting to take over Mars.

Just because I don't hate white south africans, like he does, does not mean I'm a racist. In my view, if a man is born in SA, then its HIS country, no matter the colour of his skin. Tiger32, on the other hand, likes the taste of white blood.

The only "racist" here is you, Tiger32. Now get out of my face, junior.

8th November 2002 04:50
Click Here to See the Profile for thiswoundedsoul    Find more posts by thiswoundedsoul        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
Jaybang
Senior Member

Registered: May 2002
Posts: 586

I think everyone on this site knows that Tiger calls every white person a racist. So when he says it now, it holds no value.

You got to remember that his sole intention is to get under your skin.. thats all. Hes here to **** with white people because he has nothing better to do.

8th November 2002 05:36
Click Here to See the Profile for Jaybang    Find more posts by Jaybang        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
thiswoundedsoul
Senior Member

Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 604


You're right. But what I find most amusing is that many Africans themselves don't agree with his politics. By his reasoning, all blacks everywhere should live only in Africa. Because according to him SA land is 'stolen.' Well, North American land is stolen too, isn't it? But blacks live there, too, don't they? So, by his reasoning, he himself, a black man, should GET OUT OF AMERICA.

8th November 2002 05:40
Click Here to See the Profile for thiswoundedsoul    Find more posts by thiswoundedsoul        Edit/Delete Message    Reply w/Quote    IP: Logged
All times are SA Local (GMT+2)    This thread is 4 pages long:    1   2   3   4   Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Forum Jump:
< Last Thread     Next Thread >

Forum Rules:
Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest.
Who Can Post New Topics? Any registered user.
Who Can Post Replies? Any registered user.
Changes: Messages can be edited by their author. Messages can be deleted by their author.
Posts: HTML code is OFF. Smilies are ON. vB code is ON. [IMG] code is ON.

Admin Options:
Open / Close Thread
Move Thread
Delete Thread
Edit Thread

< contact us | home >


about | advertising | contact | jobs | affiliates | privacy | use policy | web design

vBulletin © Copyright 2000-2002 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
© Copyright 1995 - 2002 afanti-tour.com & Virtual Countries, Inc.


Site map afanti-tour.com - Directory and Complete Guide to South Africa Updates

Some of the Koh Samui villas are set on peaceful hills adjoining sea. So, when a sea wave hits the big boulders below, you are actually able to experience some butterflies in your stomachs. Such is the experience of the exotic locales where these Samui villas are located. The villas are located in peaceful places, but not much far from action. You can anytime visit the flee market to buy exotic sea shells, or belts made from fishs skin for you dear and near ones.